Foreclosure News Articles


  • Here is the picture!

 


 

The road to real estate ruin

  • Share15
 
 

Falling behind; loan modification attempts

When a mortgage payment is missed, the march toward foreclosure begins. California law requires the lender to make a good-faith effort to call or visit the borrower to discuss ways to avoid foreclosure, including free counseling and loan modification possibilities, at least 30 days before declaring default. In California and several other states, the foreclosure process unfolds largely outside a courtroom. Borrowers can find free counseling through the Department of Housing and Urban Development athttp://www.hud.gov.

Default; more modification attempts

The lender notifies a third-party trustee of the default. The trustee files a notice of default. Now the foreclosure process officially has started. A California borrower has three months to: dispute the default claim; find the money for all past payments, plus late fees and interest; get the lender to agree to a "short sale," in which the house is sold for less than the amount owed; or win a mortgage modification.

Sale notice; more modification attempts

After three months, the trustee can schedule an auction by filing a notice of trustee sale with the county. The borrower has at least 20 days to get a mortgage modification, find the payment money, arrange a short sale or convince everyone that an error has occurred. If a borrower is being considered for the federal Home Affordable Modification Program, the foreclosure process stops. Bankruptcy may delay but won't stop the auction.

Auction, eviction

If the sale isn't canceled or postponed, the house is auctioned. The buyer often is a cash-carrying investor eager to snap up a deeply discounted home. If no qualified bidders emerge, the lender takes the house, which is now considered foreclosed. If the former homeowner is still in the house, a notice to quit will be delivered allowing three days to leave before a notice of unlawful detainer is filed. The borrower can ask for a trial, which is supposed to be held within 20 days.

Foreclosure rescission

Foreclosures aren't often rescinded, but experts expect more rescissions as lawyers learn to exploit foreclosure mistakes and misdeeds. Consumers are filing more lawsuits challenging banks' right to foreclose based on faulty paperwork and improper procedures. But beating back foreclosure doesn't solve the underlying problem if the homeowner couldn't afford the mortgage payments.

Source: ForeclosureRadar.com; Times research

California home sales rise in December; median price falls again

  • Share21
 
California Housing

California's housing market was largely stagnant in December, though the San Francisco Bay Area fared slightly better than Southern California. Above, a view of San Francisco's Telegraph Hill and Coit Tower (David Paul Morris / Bloomberg)

 

 

Home sales in the Golden State rose slightly in December, boosted by a pickup in the Bay Area andinvestor activity in Southern California. But with foreclosures and other low-cost homes dominating the market, the median home price for the state ticked down.

Sales rose 4.2% from the same month a year earlier. A total of 37,734 homes were bought throughout the state in December with more than half purchased in Southern California, according to DataQuick, a residential real estate information firm based in San Diego.

The median price for the state fell 3.1% to $246,000 compared with the same month a year earlier. That made for the 15th consecutive decline.

The December data cap a year in which home prices and sales stagnated with a troubled economy and a high unemployment rate. Although there are some signs that housing may be improving — new home starts are increasing nationally, for instance, and builder confidence ticked up for the fourth consecutive month in January — many hurdles remain.

A weak job market and a shortage of buyers able to meet today's tough credit standards set by lenders are chief among those challenges.

“The spectacular gains in affordability, based on the combination of lower prices and ultra-low interest rates, was largely theoretical for many people because it was so hard to get a mortgage,” said John Walsh, DataQuick president. “That, combined with negative equity and economic uncertainty, kept people away.”

Sales activity in the Bay Area showed some improvement in December, but like Southern California’s housing market, prices continued to trend lower.

Sales in the Bay Area included few move-up buyers and lots of investors scraping the bottom, according to DataQuick. Total sales were up 4.4% from the same month a year earlier. The region’s median sale price fell 6.3% to $351,500.

In Southern California, a record number of investors and second-home buyers flooded the market in December, though that was not enough to give sales in the region a bump over the same month a year earlier. Sales fell 1.4% from December 2010 and the median slipped 6.9% to its lowest point in 2011, at $270,000.

Statewide, foreclosures and short sales -- where a lender allows a home to be sold “short” of the remaining debt due on the property -- made up more than half of California’s resale market. More than one in three homes sold in December were foreclosures while one in five were short sales, DataQuick said.

 

California and Nevada join forces in mortgage probe

The two states' attorneys general announce plans to jointly investigate misconduct and fraud in the mortgage business.

  • Share70
 
Mortgage probe

California Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris, left, and Nevada Atty. Gen. Catherine Cortez Masto announce their alliance to jointly investigate misconduct and fraud in the mortgage business. (Luis Sinco, Los Angeles Times / December 6, 2011)


An alliance by California and Nevada to jointly investigate misconduct and fraud in the mortgage business further divides efforts by the nation's attorneys general to bring the home-lending industry to account for improper foreclosure practices.




































The two states, which are at ground zero of the nation's housing bust, will join forces to probe allegations of foreclosure fraud and other wrongdoing in the mortgage markets, including the packaging and selling of mortgage-backed securities by Wall Street players and scams by smaller players offering to help troubled borrowers.

The agreement to work together, announced in Los Angeles on Tuesday by California Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris and Nevada Atty Gen. Catherine Cortez Masto, comes a week after Massachusetts said it was suing the nation's five largest mortgage servicers over alleged foreclosure illegalities. The moves escalate pressure on the nation's biggest financial institutions already in high-level negotiations with a coalition of state attorneys general over their alleged abuses.

"This potential partnership with the Nevada AG may cover a fairly broad array of issues," said Paul Leonard, California director for the Center for Responsible Lending. "Having the prospect of investigations and litigation could very well raise the stakes for — and put added pressure on — the financial institutions to come up with a settlement."

California bowed out of the multistate talks this summer, saying the banks were being let off the hook too easily, and has opened a number of probes into the mortgage business. Harris characterized her pact with Masto as an intensification of her efforts. The offices will share litigation strategies, evidence in ongoing investigations and link both the civil and criminal teams of each office.

The alliance unites two attorneys general in states with similar foreclosure processes and laws. Many of the same players acted in both states, Harris and Masto said Tuesday, resulting in a similar housing malaise.

Underscoring the harm the housing crisis has inflicted on their constituents, the attorneys general took turns Tuesday speaking in front of maps illustrating the high rates of foreclosure in both states.

"California and Nevada were particularly hard-hit as it relates to the foreclosure aspect and to the number of homeowners that we have underwater," Harris said. "In that way, we have a very specific issue in terms of the harm that has resulted to our states — and also a focus for our investigations."

In both states, the foreclosure process exists largely outside of the court system. For that reason, evidence of fraud in the foreclosure process has not emerged as readily as in other states.

Masto has perhaps made the most progress of any state attorney general in pursuing alleged fraud in the foreclosure process. Masto this week said she had widened a criminal probe that involves employees of Lender Processing Services, a Florida company that emerged as an important player in the fracas over faulty foreclosure practices. The ringleaders of the alleged scam were two Orange County loan officers.

Masto said taking action against the players involved in the housing crisis was necessary because of the harm done in the state.

"This crisis is causing great havoc in the local economy," Masto said. "Families are being forced out of their homes — vacant homes are being vandalized."

Harris also is investigating Lender Processing Services, having subpoenaed the firm this year.

California has other mortgage probes. Investigators with Harris' office have subpoenaed information from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as part of a wide-ranging inquiry into lending and foreclosure practices in the state, The Times has previously reported.

Harris' office also is investigating Bank of America Corp. and its mortgage arm Countrywide Financial, along with Citibank, seeking information on their practices selling mortgaged-backed securities in California. The Nevada attorney general has sued Bank of America and some subsidiaries, including Countrywide, accusing them of violating a consent order struck as part of a settlement with the state over its past bad lending practices.

The new alliance between Harris and Masto comes as the largest banks are working to strike a deal with a coalition of attorneys general and federal agencies that is led by Iowa Atty. Gen. Thomas Miller, who has forced the mortgage industry to accept large settlements in the past.

Masto has said the state would evaluate any proposed deal but would push ahead with her own work. New York, Delaware, Kentucky and Minnesota have signaled they are unhappy with the direction of the talks with the banks. New York and Delaware have struck their own agreement to pursue a wider probe of Wall Street's role in the mortgage meltdown.

The negotiations were expected to have produced a settlement of as much as $25 billion for the states, including a provision that would write down principal for troubled borrowers, a move long pushed for by housing advocates. But despite pressure from the Obama administration for a quick settlement that might give the beleaguered housing market a boost, those talks have dragged on for more than a year.

alejandro.lazo@latimes.com




Costa Mesa's Snoopy House display will go on despite foreclosure

A bank recently foreclosed on the home where a Christmas display featuring the 'Peanuts' gang has been set up for 44 years, but Costa Mesa City Hall has agreed to take over the display.

  • Share41
 
Snoopy House in Costa Mesa

Jim Jordan leans on his truck full of the reindeer cutouts and other props used in his Costa Mesa home's popular annual Christmas display. The home is nicknamed the Snoopy House. He was forced to remove the set pieces because a bank had foreclosed on the home. (Don Leach, Daily Pilot / December 7, 2011)

 



  •  

  •  






































For 44 years, the Jordan family crafted an elaborate Charlie Brown-themed Christmas display outside their Costa Mesa home.  The doctor was in, with a Lucy cutout offering counseling.  Charlie Brown and Sally clutched a wrapped gift.  Linus (with blanket) stood beneath the Christmas tree.  And much of the "Peanuts" gang ice-skated around a faux pond.

"I grew up around the corner from there. It's been there every year," said Lisa Dugan, who helps with the setup. "It's the magic, it's the spirit of Christmas. With everything going on in this world, it's almost like the last hope."

But like Lucy pulling the football from a galloping Charlie Brown, a bank recently foreclosed on the one-story home near the city's eastern border with Newport Beach, leaving in doubt whether the display would survive.

Jordan, who uses the home as a rental property and is challenging the Nov. 24 foreclosure, worried not only about keeping his home but also about continuing one of Costa Mesa's most treasured holiday traditions.

"My wife says I'm a frustrated Walt Disney," said Jim Jordan, 59, the family member who takes care of the house. "It's my life's work. There's a core group of us that fusses with this all year long."

Though the house is now bank-owned, there will be a Charlie Brown Christmas after all: Costa Mesa City Hall agreed to take over the display and a group of community volunteers is going to set up the "Peanuts" gang, Santa and other cutouts at the civic center across from the Orange County Fairgrounds.

"We talked about bringing the Snoopy House to City Hall to continue the rich tradition that's been here for many decades," City Manager Tom Hatch said. "Hopefully this kind of display can bring the community together."

That's good news to those who grew up seeing the comic strip characters every holiday season. There's a "Save the Snoopy House" Facebook page and Twitter account. One person even set up a tent on the home's front lawn, a mini Occupy the Snoopy House movement. Even a nearby Chick-fil-A restaurant in Santa Ana offered to set up the "Peanuts" gang outside.

Others are giving money to Jordan to see if he can reverse the foreclosure. Two of those loyal supporters, Dugan's children Jackson, 10, and Dayle, 8, set up shop Saturday at the old Snoopy House home and sold lemonade at 50 cents a cup. On Monday, the entrepreneurial duo handed Jordan $230.

"People were giving donations," Lisa Dugan said. "They just wanted to help him. They love the Snoopy House."

How Jordan lost the house is a story that Charlie Brown could appreciate. Jordan stopped paying the mortgage in 2010. He said his lawyer suggested that he stop paying so he could renegotiate his loan, which Wachovia initially had declined to modify because Jordan hadn't missed any payments. He said he hired someone to work with the bank on a loan modification, but that person just took his money without doing anything.

"I am just devastated and heartsick at how this spiraled out of control," Jordan said.

In August 2010, Jordan received a notice of default from Wells Fargo, which inherited the loan when it acquired Wachovia. Because of technicalities, there was no foreclosure notice until Nov. 24.

In an emailed statement, Wells Fargo spokeswoman Edna Silva said that the bank appreciated the Snoopy House display but that the foreclosure will continue.

"We understand that Mr. Jordan and the community have made a considerable time and financial investment in the annual holiday display outside the home," she wrote. "At this point, we are exploring multiple options on how to get his property back to him. Foreclosure is an option of last resort, and it's regrettable that we had to foreclose on Mr. Jordan's rental property. While we work hard to prevent foreclosures, it is not always avoidable."

Jordan said he was glad that the bank is willing to work with him, but it's the community rallying like Snoopy as the World War I flying ace that won his heart.

"It really went a long way to healing my heart," he said. "It meant that all was not for naught."

joseph.serna@latimes.com

Twitter: @JosephSerna





California, Nevada team up to investigate foreclosure fraud

 

Atty. Gen. Kamala Harris to join California's foreclosure probe with Nevada's investigation
California and Nevada, two states at the heart of the nation’s housing crisis, will join forces to investigate allegations of foreclosure fraud and other types of mortgage improprieties.

The agreement to share resources and work jointly is the latest sign that the nation’s state attorneys general want to be out front in cracking down on bank practices the housing crisis — from the selling of mortgage-backed securities to the handling of foreclosures.

At a joint news conference in Los Angeles on Tuesday, California Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris and Nevada Atty Gen. Catherine Cortez Masto said their offices would share litigation strategies and evidence would link their offices' civil and criminal teams.

The announcement comes less than a week after Massachusetts said it was suing the nation’s five largest mortgage servicers over alleged foreclosure illegalities. The move marked the first such litigation to be filed by a state.

Harris' office has opened a number of its own probes of the mortgage business. Investigators have subpoenaed information from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as part of a wide-ranging inquiry into lending and foreclosure practices in the state, The Times has previously reported. Her office also is investigating Bank of America and its mortgage arm Countrywide Financial, along with Citibank, seeking information on their sale of mortgaged-backed securities in California.

The new alliance between Harris and Masto comes as banks are working to strike a deal with a coalition of attorneys general who are working to seek relief for consumers allegedly wronged by faulty mortgage servicing and foreclosure practices.

Harris formally withdrew from those talks earlier this year. Masto has said Nevada officials would evaluate any proposal the talks might produce but would also push ahead with their own work. New York, Delaware, Kentucky and Minnesota also have signaled they are unhappy with the direction of the talks with the banks. All of those states have expressed concern that the banks could be let off too easily.

ALSO:

Banks' foreclosure activity picks up

California AG subpoenas Freddie, Fannie

BofA settles mortgage suit for $315 million

-- Alejandro Lazo

Photo: California Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris. Credit: Brian van der Brug/Los Angeles Times

First major state lawsuit filed over 'robo-signing'

 

 

 

 

 

After a year of fruitless negotiations between major banks and the nation's state attorneys general, Massachusetts has filed the first major lawsuit over so-called "robo-signing" foreclosure processing.

Attorney General Martha Coakley filed suit against Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citi, Ally Financial and Wells Fargo, as well as the MERS corp (Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.).

The Attorney General alleges these five entities "engaged in unfair and deceptive trade practices in violation of Massachusetts' law by: Pervasive use of fraudulent documentation in the foreclosure process, including so-called "robo-signing", foreclosing without holding the actual mortgage, corrupting Massachusetts land recording system through the use of MERS, and failing to uphold loan modification promises to Massachusetts homeowners."

The suit seeks civil penalties and restitution for slleged harm to borrowers, in addition to compensation for state registration fees that were allegedly avoided. The lawsuit also seeks "to hold the banks accountable through permanent injunctive relief to provide a solution for prior unlawful foreclosures and to require that the banks, going forward, register assignments and other documents in accordance with Massachusetts law."

When asked how much the banks could have to pay out if they lose the suit, Coakley responded, "I can't give you a number, but I can tell you it will be a lot of money."

While several lawsuits have been filed surrounding the subprime mortgage mess that resulted in the biggest housing crash since the Great Depression, this is the first state suit over alleged fraudulent documentation in foreclosure processing. The state of Nevada recently made foreclosure documentation fraud a criminal act.

The big banks are currently in negotiations with state attorneys general and the federal government over a settlement that could cost those banks $20 billion. Those talks, however, have been going on for over a year, with Massachusetts, New York and Delaware attorneys general no longer participating, and California's attorney general the main hold out. This now hits the banks in addition to that potential settlement.

"We are disappointed that Massachusetts would take this action now when negotiations are ongoing with the attorneys general and the federal government on a broader settlement that could bring immediate relief to Massachusetts borrowers rather than years of contested legal proceedings," a spokesman from JP Morgan Chase tells CNBC.

"We have been cooperating with the Attorney General as she has looked into these matters, and believe we have operated appropriately in compliance with existing laws," said a Citi spokesman.

Meanwhile, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, who is spearheading the 50 state negotiations, issued a release saying he was informed of Coakley's decision. "She also indicated that she'll evaluate the joint state-federal settlement we're negotiating, which we hope to reach soon."

Coakley, however, criticized the banks: "I believe that the banks have failed to offer meaningful and enforceable relief to homeowners for their deceptive practices."

This new lawsuit could be just the beginning of a slew of state suits against the banks if no multi-state agreement is reached.

"To us, this is all about politics," claims Jaret Seiberg, of the Washington Research Group. "Massachusetts Democrats are all getting into election mode even though State Attorney General Martha Coakley is not facing re-election. This action will generate significant attention for Coakley and will help energize the Democratic base."

Seventeen major banks are already facing a lawsuit from the Federal Housing Finance Agency over mortgage securitization issues during the housing boom and the resulting losses to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Copyright 2011 CNBC.com.

on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook


Ventura County Star 

2012 MORTGAGE DENLINQUENCIES SEEN DROPPING SHARPLY.  The Associated Press.  Posted December 7, 2011 at 7:38 a.m.
e
Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/dec/07/2012-mortgage-delinquencies-seen-dropping/#ixzz1fsG5967t 
- vcstar.com

 — NEW YORK (AP) - If the U.S. economy does not suffer more setbacks, the rate of mortgage holders behind on their payments should decline significantly by the end of next year, according to credit reporting agency TransUnion.

Mortgage delinquency rates - the ratio of borrowers 60 or more days behind on their payments - will likely tick up to about 6 percent through the first three months of 2012, TransUnion said in its annual delinquency forecast issued Wednesday.

But by the end of next year, it could drop to 5 percent, TransUnion said. That's well off the peak of 6.89 percent seen in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Chicago-based TransUnion's forecast takes into consideration several factors, including expectations that consumer confidence and the economy will improve next year.

Also, banks are expected to get a good portion of pending foreclosures off their books next year, said Charlie Wise, TransUnion director of research and consulting.

Banks are still working through a backlog of foreclosures created by issues including the robo-signing scandal, in which bank officials signed mortgage documents without verifying the information they contained. The issue surfaced last year in areas with large numbers of foreclosures, and banks had to backtrack and review foreclosures across the country to make sure their paperwork was in order.

That slowed down the process, Wise said, and left mortgages listed as delinquent for longer than they otherwise might have been, temporarily boosting delinquency rates.

Economic uncertainty has also contributed. In the third quarter of 2011, mortgage delinquencies saw their first uptick in six quarters, largely fueled by concerns over the economy as lawmakers were debating the U.S. debt ceiling and Europe's debt crisis was unfolding.

Helping to cut the mortgage delinquency rate are a slowly improving job market and a stabilizing housing market.

While the drop will be significant, the rate will remain well above the pre-recession average of 1.5 to 2 percent.

"We have a long way to go to get back," said Steven Chaouki, a TransUnion vice president.

The situation with credit cards is much stronger. Card delinquencies - payments late by 90 days or more - dropped to their lowest levels in 17 years during the spring, then saw a slight increase in the third quarter, but still remained near historic lows.

TransUnion expects further edging up in the current quarter and the first three months of 2012, but then late payments on bank-issued cards should fall again.

One reason card delinquencies are expected to remain so low is that credit is much tighter than it was before the recession. TransUnion data showed that nearly a quarter million new card accounts were opened by people with less-than-stellar credit scores during the third quarter, which contributed to the slight increase in late payments during the summer months. But banks are mainly still going after consumers with top-tier credit histories.

"Lenders are willing to lend, but are still pursuing the best customers," said Chaouki.

TransUnion predicts by the end of 2012, just 0.69 percent of cards will be considered delinquent, down from a predicted 0.74 percent in the current quarter. The rate has wobbled in the last few years, peaking at 1.36 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007, then dropping and bouncing back up to 1.32 percent in the first quarter of 2009.

The figures reflect a shift in which debt payments consumers consider most important, largely because home prices fell so far.

Chaouki said the conventional wisdom before the Great Recession was that homeowners would put their mortgages first because of concern about their reputation and the emotional attachment involved in owning a home. But what has become clear as housing prices have continued to fall, he said, is that bill payment is far more practical.

"People were protecting their home equity," he said. Credit cards were relatively easy to come by in years past, he said, so when money got tight, it was an easy decision to default on cards and maintain house payments. Now it's common to owe more on a mortgage than a house is actually worth, but credit cards are harder to get. So consumers are being practical and protecting what is more valuable to them.

He said he expects the equation will shift again if housing prices rebound and people go back to building home equity.




Home prices dip in September, ending five straight months of gains

The Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller index of 20 cities for September showed declines of 0.6% from August and 3.6% from September 2010.

  • Share59
 
Home prices

Portland, Ore., was one of only three cities in the Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller index where home prices rose from August to September, although it was only 0.1%. Above, a Portland home for sale. (Rick Bowmer, Associated Press /November 28, 2011)

 






























 

 







Home prices in the nation's largest cities fell in September, a widely followed index showed, underscoring the unrelenting weakness in the housing market that could last well into next year.

The Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller index of 20 American cities, a key measure that is closely watched by economists, declined 0.6% from August to September and 3.6% from September 2010. The drop ended five months of month-over-month gains.

Analysts had expected a decline in prices given the end of the busy home-shopping season. Nevertheless, the reversal of home-price gains casts a cloud over recent data that had shown some improvement in housing, such as increased builder confidence and an uptick in building starts. With the fresh home-price data released Tuesday, several analysts noted that a recovery remains out of sight this year.

"Any chance for a sustained recovery will probably need a stronger economy," said David M. Blitzer, chairman of the S&P index committee.

Home prices, as measured by the 20-city index, are 2% above their bottom hit in April 2009 during the depths of the financial crisis. Prices briefly dipped below that threshold in March but began gaining ground again as the spring and summer selling seasons pushed prices up.

New foreclosure actions and weak demand probably will drive prices down an additional 5% to 10%, and perhaps more, if the economy slips into a double-dip recession, economists Patrick Newport and Michelle Valverde wrote in a research note Tuesday. The two, who track the U.S. economy for consulting firm IHS Global Insight, said the large number of people who remain behind on their mortgages and the high percentage of American homeowners who owe more on their properties than they are worth will also be a major drag on housing for the foreseeable future.

"Add to this the current high unemployment and underemployment rates, one gets a recipe for further price declines," the economists wrote. "Should the economy slip into a recession … the unemployment rate will climb, driving foreclosures up and leading to an even larger drop in home prices."

Even if prices begin to show some strength next year, they will probably continue to muddle along as foreclosures continue to cycle through the market, said Paul Diggle, property economist for Capital Economics.

"Even when prices do reach their trough, which could be next year, a continued influx of foreclosed and vacant properties onto the market will prevent the sharp bounce back that valuations might suggest is due," he wrote in a note.

In a speech Tuesday at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Federal Reserve Vice Chair Janet L. Yellen called for more housing stimulus.

"A sharp downturn in housing was at the core of the previous recession, and this sector continues to weigh on the recovery," she said. "I see a strong case for additional policies to foster more rapid recovery in the housing sector."

All of the California cities in the index posted price declines from August. Los Angeles and San Diego were down 0.8%, and San Francisco fell 1.5%.

Despite the declines, home prices in California cities measured by the index are comparatively healthy despite the state's high unemployment rate. The markets tracked by the index are close to key job centers such as Hollywood and Silicon Valley and are also near the ocean, where overbuilding was relatively restrained.

The index does not track prices in California's Central Valley or the Inland Empire, where housing is still weak and the foreclosure rates of many cities are among the nation's highest.

Three U.S. cities posted new crisis lows in September, according to the Case-Shiller index. Both Atlanta and Phoenix joined Las Vegas in plumbing fresh depths. While Phoenix home prices are almost back to their January 2000 levels, those in Atlanta and Las Vegas have fallen below that benchmark.

A separate index by S&P/Case-Shiller measuring national home prices ticked up 0.1% from the second quarter, putting home prices at the same level they were at in the third quarter of 2003. The national index posted a year-over-year decline of 3.9%, which was better than the 5.8% drop in the second quarter.

The news that home prices had renewed their decline came as CoreLogic, a Santa Ana research firm that tracks the mortgage market, reported that more than 1 in 5 American home mortgages were underwater.

An estimated 10.7-million households, or 22.1% of all homes with mortgages, had more debt on the properties than they were worth in the third quarter, according to CoreLogic. This is a slight decline from the 10.9 million properties that were underwater in the second quarter.

"Although slightly down, negative equity remains very high and renders many borrowers vulnerable when negative economic shocks occur, such as job loss or illness," CoreLogic Chief Economist Mark Fleming said. "The nearly $700-billion mortgage debt overhang has touched many corners of the market, and this overhang is holding back the recovery of the housing market and broader economy."

Nevada led all states with 58% of mortgaged homes underwater, followed by Arizona, 47%; Florida, 44%; Michigan, 35%; and Georgia, 30%. This was the first quarter that Georgia made the top five, ousting California, which had been among the top spots since CoreLogic began tracking the data in 2009.

In the Los Angeles metropolitan area, 353,427 homes, or 23% of all mortgaged properties, were in negative equity at the end of the third quarter, a decline from 356,677. The number of homes with negative equity can decline when foreclosures increase because the repossession process extinguishes underwater loans.

alejandro.lazo@latimes.com





 



 
Copyright © 2002-2012 RealtyTech, Inc.    Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use |  Agent Center   Real Estate Websites by RealtyTech.com